Love And Disaster

Terrence Howard and Anika Noni Rose in Williams’s Pulitzer Prize-winning play.Illustration by Mark Ulriksen

The real star of the latest production of “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof ” (at the Broadhurst, directed by Debbie Allen) is the play itself. Listening to Tennessee Williams’s rare poetry, which grounds his characters’ lush speech in the exaggeratedly colloquial, is made all the more delectable by his witchy, fine-fanged humor—and his compassion. The play was first produced on Broadway in 1955, and went on to win that year’s Pulitzer Prize. During the show’s nearly three-hour running time, one is alert less to the action—which is relatively minimal—than to the various aesthetic tightropes that Williams walks, the most obvious being his skillful balance of melodrama and artistry. At times, you can feel him reaching so high to incorporate into his work both a spiritual and a carnal longing for love that you fear he’ll topple over. But “Cat” keeps righting itself, largely because the hysteria that propels it—it’s a play about painful recrimination, and lies that are reversed in the face of the brutal truth—is tempered by Williams’s command of his craft. He loves the way his characters talk, but he loves their silences, too.

“Cat on a Hot Tin Roof ” grew out of a short story titled “Three Players of a Summer Game,” which the author published in this magazine in 1952. That story, about an adolescent boy’s romantic awakening, centered on four main characters, only two of whom made it to the boards: Brick Pollitt and his wife, Margaret. In the play, Brick (Terrence Howard, making his stage and Broadway débuts) calls his wife Maggie; she calls herself Maggie the Cat. Her feline qualities, like her self-interest, are hard to miss—she’s coyly flirtatious with Brick’s father, Big Daddy (James Earl Jones), the family patriarch and wealthy plantation owner, and she’s skittish around Brick, who rejects her sexually. Not that Maggie (Anika Noni Rose) blames him, not much: sometime before the action begins, Maggie slept with Brick’s unstable buddy, Skipper, in order to break up the close friendship between the two men and win back her husband’s attentions. Now Maggie thinks it’s time that she and Brick got over the affair—she wants a child, and to become a legitimate member of the Pollitt clan. But Brick can’t move on. Soon after Maggie slept with Skipper, and Brick rebuffed his attempts to confess, Skipper more or less drank himself to death. Brick can’t live with the guilt—or with Maggie.

Despite her relative emotional ruthlessness, Maggie’s a conventional girl at heart. She loves Brick, though perhaps she loves his princelike status in the family more. Having grown up poor, Maggie wants to be the child who’s got her own. It’s a tricky act to pull off, and one that can all too easily expose an actress’s weaknesses. On the night I saw the show, I could feel Rose’s anxiety in the role immediately. She may be too young for the part, and too full of self-regard. As she stretches and cozies up to Brick like an animal circling its hoped-for owner, her movements seem too studied—one feels that her desire is annoying enough for any man to turn his back on.

Under Debbie Allen’s eager-to-please direction, the women are either caricatures or shrill harridans. As Brick’s doting mother, Big Mama, Phylicia Rashad (Allen’s sister) is a parody of the Southern matriarch. And as Brick’s sister-in-law Mae—a broad part that should be played subtly—Lisa Arrindell Anderson is merely a shouter; she’s all clenched and flexed. We see her ambition, but nothing of the twisted spirit that informs it. In general, Allen seems barely interested in exploring Williams’s soulfulness. Twice during the show, she has a black saxophone player walk onstage and blow a mournful tune. Why? To remind us that this is an all-black production?

Race plays as much or as little a role in this revival as you want it to. When the incredible Jones uses the word “nigger,” to describe his boyhood self, you can feel how hard Big Daddy has worked to rise above all epithets to become himself. The smallness of life hasn’t stood in Big Daddy’s way, and this is one reason that Brick’s resignation baffles his father, even as he reaches out to him. Jones understands Williams’s language, and relaxes into it; his frame puffs up with pride and pleasure, like a peacock, as he shows off Big Daddy’s charm. Howard, for his part, conveys Brick’s barely repressed grief, and he beautifully channels his character’s paralyzing sense of defeat. When they’re together, Howard and Jones manage to transcend the play’s weak direction; they tap into Williams’s jazzy partial score about fathers and sons and the women who may or may not love them.

In “Adding Machine” (at the Minetta Lane), brilliance comes and goes, like a cork riding high on the sea. There is no doubting the talent of this chamber musical’s young composer, Joshua Schmidt, and his co-lyricist, Jason Loewith, especially when you consider their unlikely source material: Elmer L. Rice’s didactic seven-act play, “The Adding Machine.”

First produced in 1923, Rice’s seventh stage play—he had written a number of successful melodramas—was lauded for its Expressionistic dialogue and distinctly modern concerns: racism, loneliness, alienation. At the heart of the piece is Mr. Zero (played, in this production, by Joel Hatch)—a sweet but dim-witted and, ultimately, murderous office worker who craves respect. Entrancingly staged by the director David Cromer, the show’s cold, angular sets invoke the early Expressionist works of the filmmaker King Vidor, who mined similar territory—the loss of the individual and of honor, the deadening effects of automation—in works like “The Big Parade” and “The Crowd.” (Takeshi Kata, Keith Parham, and Kristine Knanishu, who are the show’s outstanding scenic, lighting, and costume designers, respectively, help achieve Cromer’s bleak vision.)

After a rousing start—courtesy of Cyrilla Baer as Mrs. Zero, who opens the show with a cruel and complicated aria about her troubled marriage—the action shifts to Mr. Zero at work, where he adds sums in a ledger. The numbers are read aloud to him in a flat, weary voice by his co-worker and occasional love interest, Daisy (the gifted Amy Warren). Daisy looks like a Madame Alexander doll that has been socked in the eye and then left out in the rain. Her heart’s been bruised, too, but how to repair it? Certainly Mr. Zero can’t give her the love she requires. He’s too worried about the promotion he believes he deserves. And, when it doesn’t come, he kills his boss, and is condemned to death. Life will not miss him.

A stellar supporting cast is backed up by an offstage group of musicians who play the score, which ranges from Gershwin-like ragtime to Weill-inspired jazz. The play’s one troubling note is its main character’s affect: Hatch plays Zero as Rice and the makers of this musical intended—as a blowhard with nothing to say—but his lack of presence means there’s little to latch on to when he’s onstage (which is most of the time). Luckily, Baer and Warren are compelling enough to fill the void that Mr. Zero leaves in his wake. They are the performers you most want to watch, and their collective magic illuminates what is clearly at work behind this production: a desire to make remarkable theatre.

“Liberty City” (at New York Theatre Workshop) is a one-woman show starring a very appealing actress named April Yvette Thompson. The ninety-minute piece is based on her life—first as a child, and then as a young woman growing up in Liberty City, a part of Miami that is home to many people of the Caribbean diaspora. Co-written and directed by Jessica Blank, the show has a lot of pep, and a few too many stock characters. Thompson could inhabit her characters with greater physical ease; she is too tentative all around, but especially when it comes to embodying her revolution-minded dad, or her sympathetic and tolerant mother. She stands outside these characters, shyly, and like a little girl—but she’s a grownup now, and an actress, so she should tell us about the citizens of her world with more physical expression. Nonetheless, Thompson’s storytelling skills are solid and endearing, and she manages what “Cat” ’s Anika Noni Rose does not: she telegraphs, truthfully, her awkwardness and uncertainty, which ultimately win us over. ♦