In this week’s issue, both the cover, “Soda Noir,” by Owen Smith, and Lizzie Widdicombe’s Talk of the Town story, “Fluid Ounces,” refer to Mayor Bloomberg’s plan to limit the sale of large containers of sugary beverages at restaurants and other outlets in New York City. (The mayor’s plan was submitted to the city’s health board yesterday and will be voted on in September.) Bloomberg is not the first mayor to cause a beverage controversy. In 1940, Fiorella LaGuardia used a radio address to tell the citizens of the city that there was essentially no difference (other than the price) between Grade A and Grade B milk. The uproar, as M. R. Wemer reported in our pages, led to the creation of a single grade of “approved milk.”
Bloomberg is also far from the first critic to raise public-health concerns about soft drinks. In a multi-part Profile of Coca-Cola, published in 1959, E. J. Kahn, Jr., wrote about the contentious relationship between government and the beverage manufacturer during Coke’s early years. At the center of the fracas was nutritional science:
On the contrary, as Kahn notes, in the late nineteenth century, Coca-Cola often touted its signature product’s health benefits: “Coke has been advertised as a ‘remarkable therapeutic agent,’ a ‘sovereign remedy,’ and a cure for, among other indispositions, headaches, neuralgia, hysteria, melancholy, insomnia, biliousness, and spring fever.”
These claims ceased in 1902, when the company sued the government for a refund of nearly eleven thousand dollars in federal taxes that had been imposed on it because the drink was classified by the government as a “medicinal proprietary.” A jury decided in favor of Coca-Cola, which got back its tax money with interest.
Perhaps no government official was more critical of Coca-Cola than Dr. Harvey W. Wiley, a physician and chemist who worked for the Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Chemistry. To Wiley’s mind, the makers of Coca-Cola and all other caffeine-containing drinks were “dope peddlers” and “poisoners.” As Kahn wrote:
In 1909, Wiley prodded the government into accusing the Coca-Cola Company of violating the Pure Food and Drug Act. The case, known as the United States v. Forty Barrels and Twelve Kegs of Coca-Cola, dragged through the judiciary for nine years, going all the way to the Supreme Court, which remanded it back to the federal district court in Chattanooga where it had begun. By then, Wiley had left the government. Kahn describes the outcome:
Any favorite New Yorker articles come to mind? Send us an e-mail.
Illustration by Owen Smith.